added it in the zone block.
CLOUDSTACK-8229
Testing: tested with KVM and zone deployment was fine.
In the config file, zone wide primary storage details looks like this:
"primaryStorages": [
{
"url": "nfs://10.147.28.7/export/home/talluri/primary1",
"XRT_PriStorageType": "NFS",
"name": "XenRT-Zone-0-Pod-0-Cluster-0-Primary-Store-0",
"hypervisor": "KVM",
"scope" : "zone"
}
],
reviewed-by: talluri
Design Document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+VM+listing+by+User+ID
- Adds column to VMInstance DAO
- Adds column in vm_instance table
- Adds column in the UserVMJoinVO
- Adds default admin user which has UID = 2
- Adds migration path that sets user_id to first user of the accountId that
owns the vm in vm_instance table
- Add arg on list VMs API to query by userId, add support in query layer
- Refactor VMInstanceVO and child classes to accept userId
- Add code to let service layer pass userId if loggedIn user belongs to same
account as the owner executing an API call or use first user from owner account
- In case of CPVM and SSVM use system user ID
- Fix unit tests and spring injections
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Revert "Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the original setup Purpose of this code:"
This reverts commit 7461297f3e17b431643e7a8c575e799d0e151261.
Generate CCP Objects (VMs, Volumes, Snapshots, VPC, etc..) and CCP Use Cases (Networking, Data Content,etc) before an external action on the CCP Setup and verify the integrity of the CCP Objects and the Use Cases after the external action on the CCP Setup. The integrity of the CCP Objects is verified by performing operations that test the Usability of the objects. This validates the intactness of the setup after an external action. The submitted patch covers only few major use cases. It proves that similar code can be added in future to address similar goals in verifying the integrity of CCP objects belonging to different components of the product.
The code format can be followed to verify validity of real time business use cases while any code changes (CCP,hypervisor,external devices code, etc…) happen over a period of time.
The following are the scenarios that the code format can be used for:
1.Upgrade Validity Verification
a. CCP Upgrade
b. Hypervisors Upgrade
c. External Devices Upgrade
d. System VM Template Changes.
2.Patch Validity Verification
Code can be used as one of the primary Components to validity Upgrades. It will facilitate the automation of Upgrade Test Verification completely.
How to use the code:
*Kindly make the corresponding substitutions in the commands listed below.
Execute:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=$CONFIG $BASEDIR/integration/component/ test_minimal_ug_check.py --load -a tags=preupgrade
After Upgrade or any Changes done to the Setup, Verify that the existing CCP objects are not affected due to the external changes.
Execute:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=$CONFIG $BASEDIR/integration/component/ test_minimal_ug_check.py --load -a tags=postupgrade
Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri <talluri@apache.org>
