CLOUDSTACK-9789: Fix releasing secondary guest IP fails with associated static nat which is actually not used
* pr/1947:
CLOUDSTACK-9789: Fix releasing secondary guest IP fails with associated static nat which is actually not used
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9628: Fix Template Size in Swift as Secondary StorageCloudstack incorrectly uses the physical size as the size of the
template. Ideally, the size should refelct the virtual size. This
PR fixes that issue.
* pr/1770:
CLOUDSTACK-9628: Use correct virtualsize with Swift as secondary storage
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list snapshot command when a primary store is deleted related to it@mike-tutkowski After support for snapshots on solidifire there are many places which are prone to these NullPointer exceptions resulting in various issues. Root cause for these issues is that we get the primary storage associated with snapshot and then figure out how to handle but if that store is deleted then it results in NullPointer exceptions. Without solidfire we don't need to access primary storage.
Should we handle that as issues are found or could there be other way to fix all of these issues?
* pr/1847:
CLOUDSTACK-9691: Added test list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store
CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list snapshot command when a primary store is deleted related to it
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9655 The template which is registered in all zones will be deleted by deleting 1 template on any zoneadded extra warning message if it's a cross-zone template ("This is a
cross zone template and will be deleted from all the zones. Are you sure
you want to proceed?").
* pr/1818:
CLOUDSTACK-9655 The template which is registered in all zones will be deleted by deleting 1 template on any zone
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.
While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.
computing the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when the
volume is on a different storage pool.
Testing:
I couldnt write unittests for it. This class is not in a unittestable state.
manually tested in the below environment
1. xenserver 6.5 setup with 2 clusters and a host each in each of them.
2. added storage tags for the primary storage.
3. created two service offerings with the storage tags.
4. deployed two vms using newly created offerings in step 3.
5. at this stage, there are two vms one on each host with root disks on the corresponding primary.
6. create a data disk and attach it to vm1
7. detach the data disk. now the data disk is in the primary storage of the cluster of vm1 (let us say primary1)
8. attach this data disk to vm2(running on a host in different cluster)
9. the volume should be moved to the primary storage of another cluster and op_host_capacity should be accordingly updated.
* pr/873:
CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
deleted by deleting 1 template on any zone
added extra warning message if it's a cross-zone template ("This is a
cross zone template and will be deleted from all the zones. Are you sure
you want to proceed?").
This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.
While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.
computing the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when the
volume is on a different storage pool.
[4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes in VRIn network VR, the routes to current subnets are missing in corresponding ip route Table.
It is a typo in commit 6749785caba78a9379e94bf3aaf0c1fbc44c5445
In VPC VR, it works fine.
* pr/1929:
CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes in VR
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable
Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration
If snapshot.backup.rightafter is set to false (defaults to true), snapshots are
not backed up to secondary storage.
This is the same as PR #1644 applied to 4.9, as per @jburwell
* pr/1697:
CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-8805: Domains become inactive automatically.Handled the '%' case by replacing that with a literal character rather than a wildcard character.
* pr/775:
CLOUDSTACK-8805: Domains become inactive automatically. Handled the '%' case by replacing that with a literal character rather than a wildcard character.
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
[4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in redundant VRsThe password server in RVRs has wrong parameters as the gateway of guest nics is None.
In this case, we should get the gateway from /var/cache/cloud/cmdline.
This issue is caused by commit 45642b83821ce0ecd6d4cddb76a77a2481e54d9a
* pr/1871:
CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in redundant VRs
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
The password server in RVRs has wrong parameters as the gateway of guest nics is None.
In this case, we should get the gateway from /var/cache/cloud/cmdline.
Use separate lvcreate command on XenServer7 hosts, that checks and passes
different parameters based on the xenserver release version.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
4.9 multiplex testingThis merges several PRs in this PR, this is for speeding up test efforts.
* pr/1854:
CLOUDSTACK-9688: Fix VR smoke test failure in vpc_vpn
CLOUDSTACK-9688: Fix failing test_volumes on centos7/kvm
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there are child VM snapshots
CLOUDSTACK-9612: Fixed issue in restarting redundant network with cleanup Rvr Network with cleanup which is updated from the isolated network is failed. Corrected the column name string issue.
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there are child VM snapshots
CLOUDSTACK-9673 Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup over standard vSwitches
CLOUDSTACK-9617: Fixed enabling remote access after PF or LB configured on vpn tcp ports
CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixed applying ingress rules without ports
CLOUDSTACK-9639: Unable to create shared network with vLan isolation
CLOUDSTACK-9597: Should not fetch resource count for removed entity
CLOUDSTACK-9649: In the management server log there is an error related to 0.0.0.0 IP address
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
The test_vpc_vpn uses a cidr that overlaps with the base test environment's
CIDR causing intermittent failure. This changes the cidr to not overlap
with underlying infra and avoid future failures.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Due to OS/hypervisor/environmental configuration, detaching a disk/device
using libvirt can be successful without updating the domain configuration (xml).
This leads to reattachment failure as the device is blocked until the next
reboot. This fixes a specific environment case by performing stop/start on
the VM only in case of KVM, which will recreate a fresh domain config (xml)
as KVM VMs have transient domain configs (xmls don't persist).
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in VMware setup over standard vSwitchesJira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in VMware setup over standard vSwitches
Issue
====
Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup using standard vswitches.
```
StartCommand failed due to Exception: com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExists
message: [] com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExistsFaultMsg: The specified key, name, or identifier already exists
```
Fix
===
Ensure synchronization while attempting to create port group such that simultaneous attempts are not made with same port group name on same ESXi host.
Testing
======
Successfully ran manual tests (deploy user instance) on top of latest master commit `17653a86fad67447a4f13e455e336694ad5c1735`.This code change is involved in virtual network creation over VMware standard vSwitches. Existing functional tests covers this functionality.
* pr/1827:
CLOUDSTACK-9673 Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup over standard vSwitches
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot when there are child VM snapshotsJira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot when there are child VM snapshots
Issue
====
Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there is 1 or more child VM snapshots in the snapshot tree of the VM.
Per the code, the method hasSnapshot() is supposed to detect the presence of any snapshot for the VM. But we are checking for only current snapshot instead of checking presence of any snapshot in the snapshot tree.
The failure to detect all snapshots means ACP reconfigures the VM in wrong way assuming there are no snapshots for the VM.
This results in start failure.
Fix
===
Ensure correct detection of VM snapshots in the VM snapshot tree
* pr/1828:
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there are child VM snapshots
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9597: Should not fetch resource count for removed entityFetch the number of resourceCount by domain and account excluding the removed ones.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Aurle Brothier <m@brothier.org>
* pr/1764:
CLOUDSTACK-9597: Should not fetch resource count for removed entity
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9649: In the management server log there is an error
ISSUE
============
In the management server log there is an error
2016-10-01 00:07:31,670 ERROR [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-417:ctx-e8c89b3f strmg-esx-01, cmd: GetRouterAlertsCommand) (logid:7beb3819) Command failed due to Exception: java.io.IOException
Message: There was a problem while connecting to 0.0.0.0:3922
In case of basic zone and VMWare ESXi host, the NIC 2 always gets 0.0.0.0 as IP address. Looks like we are generating an error for connecting through this invalid IP.
2016-10-01 04:37:31,680 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-8880f9c8) (logid:946838b8) Details from executing class com.cloud.agent.api.routing.GetRouterAlertsCommand: Command failed due to Exception: java.io.IOException
Message: There was a problem while connecting to 0.0.0.0:3922
2016-10-01 04:37:31,680 WARN [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-8880f9c8) (logid:946838b8) Unable to get alerts from router r-4-VM Command failed due to Exception: java.io.IOException
Message: There was a problem while connecting to 0.0.0.0:3922
2016-10-01 04:37:31,682 DEBUG [c.c.n.ExternalDeviceUsageManagerImpl] (ExternalNetworkMonitor-1:ctx-913c7bae) (logid:1b926a60) External devices stats collector is running...
Root Cause:
As Link local is not used in basic zone mode (vmware). 0.0.0.0 is just shown as a placeholder address. In getRouterAlerts before sending GetRouterAlertsCommand added check for ip and skip the command if ip is '0.0.0.0'.
* pr/1811:
CLOUDSTACK-9649: In the management server log there is an error related to 0.0.0.0 IP address
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9639: Unable to create shared network with vLan isolationDescription:
=========
Create shared network fails with Error.
While creating a shared network it fails to create with Error "The new IP range you have specified has overlapped with the guest network in the zone: XYZ. Please specify a different gateway/netmask"
Steps to Reproduce:
===============
1. Create an isolated network with a subnet eg: 10.1.1.0/24
2. Create a shared network with the same subnet but different VLAN, we should observe this issue.
Expected Behaviour:
===============
It shouldn't restrict the creation of the guest network with the same subnet as long as they are segmented by VLAN.
ACTUAL BEHAVIOR:
===============
It doesn't allow the creation of shared guest networks if there is any isolated guest network using the same subnet although it allows using the same subnet in multiple shared networks.
Cause:
=====
The issue is happening because, when Shared network is getting created we are checking if there is any guest network already implemented with the same CIDR and throwing the error without checking if they are having same VLAN also. Creating the same CIDR shared network with different VLAN should be allowed.
Fix:
===
When creating a shared network, if there is any existing guest network with the same CIDR, we check if they are having the same VLAN, if they are in same VLAN, then we don't allow creating it. If they are in the same CIDR with different VLAN then we allowing to create the network.
* pr/1804:
CLOUDSTACK-9639: Unable to create shared network with vLan isolation
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Issue
====
Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there is 1 or more child VM snapshots in the snapshot tree of the VM.
Per the code that detects the presence of a snapshot, we are checking for only current snapshot instead of checking presence of any snapshot in the snapshot tree.
The failure to detect all snapshots means ACP reconfigures the VM in wrong way assuming there are no snapshots for the VM.
This results in start failure.
Fix
===
Ensure correct detection of VM snapshots in the VM snapshot tree
This closes#1828
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi <sateesh.chodapuneedi@accelerite.com>
(cherry picked from commit 673bb25b5936d1c54e9210781280e9ddc507c830)
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Rvr Network with cleanup which is updated from the isolated network is failed.
Corrected the column name string issue.
This closes#1781
(cherry picked from commit 0f742e17237fc84d5e86dae9a67c7ef6a0b6c80c)
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9617: Fixed enabling remote access after PF configured on Enabling Remote access Vpn Fails when there is a portforwarding rule of the reserved ports ( 1701 , 500 , 4500) under TCP protocol on Source nat IP
* pr/1782:
CLOUDSTACK-9617: Fixed enabling remote access after PF or LB configured on vpn tcp ports
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without portsWhen ingress rule is applied without ports (port start and port end params are not passed) then API/UI is showing rule got applied but in the VR, iptables rule not got applied.
Fixed this issue in the VR script.
* pr/1783:
CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixed applying ingress rules without ports
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
XenServer 7 SupportThis PR adds support for XenServer 7. I have manually done the following tests
- Create a new cluster with XenServer7
- Add Primary storage: Should create an SR on XS7
- Add another XS7 host to the Pool
- Add host2 to Cloudstack
- Create VM1 from template
- Create VM2 from template
- Ping/SSH VM1 to VM2 and vice-versa
- Stop/Delete/Expunge VM2
- Create Data disk
- Attach it to VM1
- Create VM snaphsot of VM1
- Restore VM snapshot of VM1
- Delete VM snapshot of VM1
- Create Volume snapshot of Datadisk
- Create volume snapshot of Root disk
- Create new template from snapshot of root disk
- Create volume from snapshot of datadisk
- Detach datadisk volume
- Delete datadisk volume
- Aquire a public IP
- Create a static nat to VM1
- Live migrate VM1 while traffic on VM
- Delete VM1
* pr/1711:
[CLOUDSTACK-9662] Add support for XenServer 7
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
schema: Upgrade path from 4.9.1.0 to 4.9.2.0Upgrade paths added so PRs such as #1711 can use it.
* pr/1851:
schema: Upgrade path from 4.9.1.0 to 4.9.2.0
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9683: system.vm.default.hypervisor will pin the hypervisor for VR too with this fix
* pr/1839:
CLOUDSTACK-9683: system.vm.default.hypervisor will pin the hypervisor for VR too with this fix
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Issue
====
Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot, when there is 1 or more child VM snapshots in the snapshot tree of the VM.
Per the code that detects the presence of a snapshot, we are checking for only current snapshot instead of checking presence of any snapshot in the snapshot tree.
The failure to detect all snapshots means ACP reconfigures the VM in wrong way assuming there are no snapshots for the VM.
This results in start failure.
Fix
===
Ensure correct detection of VM snapshots in the VM snapshot tree
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi <sateesh.chodapuneedi@accelerite.com>
Issue
====
Exception occured while creating the CPVM in the VmWare Setup using standard vswitches.
StartCommand failed due to Exception: com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExists
message: [] com.vmware.vim25.AlreadyExistsFaultMsg: The specified key, name, or identifier already exists
Fix
===
Ensure synchronization while attempting to create port group such that simultaneous attempts are not made with same port group name on same ESXi host.
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi <sateesh.chodapuneedi@accelerite.com>
