mirror of
				https://github.com/vyos/vyos-documentation.git
				synced 2025-10-26 08:41:46 +01:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			476 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			476 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. _nat:
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAT
 | |
| ===
 | |
| 
 | |
| Source NAT
 | |
| ----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Source NAT is typically referred to simply as NAT. To be more correct, what
 | |
| most people refer to as NAT is actually the process of **Port Address
 | |
| Translation (PAT)**, or **NAT Overload**. The process of having many internal
 | |
| host systems communicate to the Internet using a single or subset of IP
 | |
| addresses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To setup SNAT, we need to know:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The internal IP addresses we want to translate;
 | |
| * The outgoing interface to perform the translation on;
 | |
| * The external IP address to translate to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the example used for the Quick Start configuration above, we demonstrate
 | |
| the following configuration:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set nat source rule 100 outbound-interface 'eth0'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 100 source address '192.168.0.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 100 translation address 'masquerade'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Which generates the following configuration:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   rule 100 {
 | |
|       outbound-interface eth0
 | |
|       source {
 | |
|           address 192.168.0.0/24
 | |
|       }
 | |
|       translation {
 | |
|           address masquerade
 | |
|       }
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, we use **masquerade** as the translation address instead of
 | |
| an IP address. The **masquerade** target is effectively an alias to say "use
 | |
| whatever IP address is on the outgoing interface", rather than a statically
 | |
| configured IP address. This is useful if you use DHCP for your outgoing
 | |
| interface and do not know what the external address will be.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When using NAT for a large number of host systems it recommended that a
 | |
| minimum of 1 IP address is used to NAT every 256 host systems. This is due to
 | |
| the limit of 65,000 port numbers available for unique translations and a
 | |
| reserving an average of 200-300 sessions per host system.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example: For an ~8,000 host network a source NAT pool of 32 IP addresses is
 | |
| recommended.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A pool of addresses can be defined by using a **-** in the 
 | |
| `set nat source rule [n] translation address` statement.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set nat source rule 100 translation address '203.0.113.32-203.0.113.63'
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note:: Avoiding "leaky" NAT
 | |
| 
 | |
| Linux netfilter will not NAT traffic marked as INVALID. This often confuses
 | |
| people into thinking that Linux (or specifically VyOS) has a broken NAT
 | |
| implementation because non-NATed traffic is seen leaving an external interface.
 | |
| This is actually working as intended, and a packet capture of the "leaky"
 | |
| traffic should reveal that the traffic is either an additional TCP "RST",
 | |
| "FIN,ACK", or "RST,ACK" sent by client systems after Linux netfilter considers
 | |
| the connection closed. The most common is the additional TCP RST some host
 | |
| implementations send after terminating a connection (which is implementation-
 | |
| specific).
 | |
| 
 | |
| In other words, connection tracking has already observed the connection be
 | |
| closed and has transition the flow to INVALID to prevent attacks from
 | |
| attempting to reuse the connection.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can avoid the "leaky" behavior by using a firewall policy that drops
 | |
| "invalid" state packets.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Having control over the matching of INVALID state traffic, e.g. the ability to
 | |
| selectively log, is an important troubleshooting tool for observing broken
 | |
| protocol behavior. For this reason, VyOS does not globally drop invalid state
 | |
| traffic, instead allowing the operator to make the determination on how the
 | |
| traffic is handled.
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAT Reflection/Hairpin NAT
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note:: Avoiding NAT breakage in the absence of split-DNS
 | |
| 
 | |
| A typical problem with using NAT and hosting public servers is the ability for
 | |
| internal systems to reach an internal server using it's external IP address.
 | |
| The solution to this is usually the use of split-DNS to correctly point host
 | |
| systems to the internal address when requests are made internally. Because
 | |
| many smaller networks lack DNS infrastructure, a work-around is commonly
 | |
| deployed to facilitate the traffic by NATing the request from internal hosts
 | |
| to the source address of the internal interface on the firewall. This technique
 | |
| is commonly referred to as **NAT Reflection**, or **Hairpin NAT**.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, we will be using the example Quick Start configuration above
 | |
| as a starting point.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To setup a NAT reflection rule, we need to create a rule to NAT connections
 | |
| from the internal network to the same internal network to use the source
 | |
| address of the internal interface.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 description 'NAT Reflection: INSIDE'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 destination address '192.168.0.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 outbound-interface 'eth1'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 source address '192.168.0.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 translation address 'masquerade'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Which results in a configuration of:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   rule 110 {
 | |
|       description "NAT Reflection: INSIDE"
 | |
|       destination {
 | |
|           address 192.168.0.0/24
 | |
|       }
 | |
|       outbound-interface eth1
 | |
|       source {
 | |
|           address 192.168.0.0/24
 | |
|       }
 | |
|       translation {
 | |
|           address masquerade
 | |
|       }
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| Destination NAT
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| DNAT is typically referred to as a **Port Forward**. When using VyOS as a NAT
 | |
| router and firewall, a common configuration task is to redirect incoming
 | |
| traffic to a system behind the firewall.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, we will be using the example Quick Start configuration above
 | |
| as a starting point.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To setup a destination NAT rule we need to gather:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The interface traffic will be coming in on;
 | |
| * The protocol and port we wish to forward;
 | |
| * The IP address of the internal system we wish to forward traffic to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In our example, we will be forwarding web server traffic to an internal web
 | |
| server on 192.168.0.100. HTTP traffic makes use of the TCP protocol on port 80.
 | |
| For other common port numbers, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
 | |
| 
 | |
| Our configuration commands would be:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 10 description 'Port Forward: HTTP to 192.168.0.100'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 10 destination port '80'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 10 inbound-interface 'eth0'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 10 protocol 'tcp'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 10 translation address '192.168.0.100'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Which would generate the following NAT destination configuration:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   nat {
 | |
|       destination {
 | |
|           rule 10 {
 | |
|               description "Port Forward: HTTP to 192.168.0.100"
 | |
|               destination {
 | |
|                   port 80
 | |
|               }
 | |
|               inbound-interface eth0
 | |
|               protocol tcp
 | |
|               translation {
 | |
|                   address 192.168.0.100
 | |
|               }
 | |
|           }
 | |
|       }
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note:: If forwarding traffic to a different port than it is arriving on,
 | |
|    you may also configure the translation port using
 | |
|    `set nat destination rule [n] translation port`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This establishes our Port Forward rule, but if we created a firewall policy it
 | |
| will likely block the traffic.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is important to note that when creating firewall rules that the DNAT
 | |
| translation occurs **before** traffic traverses the firewall. In other words,
 | |
| the destination address has already been translated to 192.168.0.100.
 | |
| 
 | |
| So in our firewall policy, we want to allow traffic coming in on the outside
 | |
| interface, destined for TCP port 80 and the IP address of 192.168.0.100.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 action 'accept'
 | |
|   set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 destination address '192.168.0.100'
 | |
|   set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 destination port '80'
 | |
|   set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 protocol 'tcp'
 | |
|   set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 state new 'enable'
 | |
| 
 | |
| This would generate the following configuration:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   rule 20 {
 | |
|       action accept
 | |
|       destination {
 | |
|           address 192.168.0.100
 | |
|           port 80
 | |
|       }
 | |
|       protocol tcp
 | |
|       state {
 | |
|           new enable
 | |
|       }
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   If you have configured the `INSIDE-OUT` policy, you will need to add
 | |
|   additional rules to permit inbound NAT traffic.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1-to-1 NAT
 | |
| ----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another term often used for DNAT is **1-to-1 NAT**. For a 1-to-1 NAT
 | |
| configuration, both DNAT and SNAT are used to NAT all traffic from an external
 | |
| IP address to an internal IP address and vice-versa.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Typically, a 1-to-1 NAT rule omits the destination port (all ports) and
 | |
| replaces the protocol with either **all** or **ip**.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then a corresponding SNAT rule is created to NAT outgoing traffic for the
 | |
| internal IP to a reserved external IP. This dedicates an external IP address
 | |
| to an internal IP address and is useful for protocols which don't have the
 | |
| notion of ports, such as GRE.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1-to-1 NAT example
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here's an extract of a simple 1-to-1 NAT configuration with one internal and
 | |
| one external interface:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set interfaces ethernet eth0 address '192.168.1.1/24'
 | |
|   set interfaces ethernet eth0 description 'Inside interface'
 | |
|   set interfaces ethernet eth1 address '192.0.2.30/24'
 | |
|   set interfaces ethernet eth1 description 'Outside interface'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 2000 description '1-to-1 NAT example'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 2000 destination address '192.0.2.30'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 2000 inbound-interface 'eth1'
 | |
|   set nat destination rule 2000 translation address '192.168.1.10'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 2000 description '1-to-1 NAT example'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 2000 outbound-interface 'eth1'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 2000 source address '192.168.1.10'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 2000 translation address '192.0.2.30'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Firewall rules are written as normal, using the internal IP address as the
 | |
| source of outbound rules and the destination of inbound rules.
 | |
| 
 | |
| NPTv6 (RFC6296)
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| NPTv6 stands for Network Prefix Translation. It's a form of NAT for IPv6. It's
 | |
| described in RFC6296_. NPTv6 is supported in linux kernel since version 3.13.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Usage
 | |
| ^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| NPTv6 is very useful for IPv6 multihoming. It is also commonly used when the external IPv6 prefix is dynamic,
 | |
| as it prevents the need for renumbering of internal hosts when the extern prefix changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Let's assume the following network configuration:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * eth0 : LAN
 | |
| * eth1 : WAN1, with 2001:db8:e1::/48 routed towards it
 | |
| * eth2 : WAN2, with 2001:db8:e2::/48 routed towards it
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regarding LAN hosts addressing, why would you choose 2001:db8:e1::/48 over
 | |
| 2001:db8:e2::/48? What happens when you get a new provider with a different
 | |
| routed IPv6 subnet?
 | |
| 
 | |
| The solution here is to assign to your hosts ULAs_ and to prefix-translate
 | |
| their address to the right subnet when going through your router.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * LAN Subnet : fc00:dead:beef::/48
 | |
| * WAN 1 Subnet : 2001:db8:e1::/48
 | |
| * WAN 2 Subnet : 2001:db8:e2::/48
 | |
| 
 | |
| * eth0 addr : fc00:dead:beef::1/48
 | |
| * eth1 addr : 2001:db8:e1::1/48
 | |
| * eth2 addr : 2001:db8:e2::1/48
 | |
| 
 | |
| VyOS Support
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| NPTv6 support has been added in VyOS 1.2 (Crux) and is available through
 | |
| `nat nptv6` configuration nodes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set rule 10 inside-prefix 'fc00:dead:beef::/48'
 | |
|   set rule 10 outside-interface 'eth1'
 | |
|   set rule 10 outside-prefix '2001:db8:e1::/48'
 | |
|   set rule 20 inside-prefix 'fc00:dead:beef::/48'
 | |
|   set rule 20 outside-interface 'eth2'
 | |
|   set rule 20 outside-prefix '2001:db8:e2::/48'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Resulting in the following ip6tables rules:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Chain VYOS_DNPT_HOOK (1 references)
 | |
|    pkts bytes target   prot opt in   out   source              destination
 | |
|       0     0 DNPT     all    eth1   any   anywhere            2001:db8:e1::/48  src-pfx 2001:db8:e1::/48 dst-pfx fc00:dead:beef::/48
 | |
|       0     0 DNPT     all    eth2   any   anywhere            2001:db8:e2::/48  src-pfx 2001:db8:e2::/48 dst-pfx fc00:dead:beef::/48
 | |
|       0     0 RETURN   all    any    any   anywhere            anywhere
 | |
|   Chain VYOS_SNPT_HOOK (1 references)
 | |
|    pkts bytes target   prot opt in   out   source              destination
 | |
|       0     0 SNPT     all    any    eth1  fc00:dead:beef::/48 anywhere          src-pfx fc00:dead:beef::/48 dst-pfx 2001:db8:e1::/48
 | |
|       0     0 SNPT     all    any    eth2  fc00:dead:beef::/48 anywhere          src-pfx fc00:dead:beef::/48 dst-pfx 2001:db8:e2::/48
 | |
|       0     0 RETURN   all    any    any   anywhere            anywhere
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAT before VPN
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Some application service providers (ASPs) operate a VPN gateway to provide access to their internal resources,
 | |
| and require that a connecting organisation translate all traffic to the service provider network to a source address provided by the ASP.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example Network
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here's one example of a network environment for an ASP.
 | |
| The ASP requests that all connections from this company should come from 172.29.41.89 - an address that is assigned by the ASP and not in use at the customer site.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. figure:: _static/images/nat_before_vpn_topology.png
 | |
|    :scale: 100 %
 | |
|    :alt: NAT before VPN Topology
 | |
| 
 | |
|    NAT before VPN Topology
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Configuration
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| The required configuration can be broken down into 4 major pieces:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * A dummy interface for the provider-assigned IP;
 | |
| * NAT (specifically, Source NAT);
 | |
| * IPSec IKE and ESP Groups;
 | |
| * IPSec VPN tunnels.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Dummy interface
 | |
| ***************
 | |
| 
 | |
| The dummy interface allows us to have an equivalent of the Cisco IOS Loopback interface - a router-internal interface we can use for IP addresses the router must know about,
 | |
| but which are not actually assigned to a real network.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We only need a single step for this interface:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set interfaces dummy dum0 address '172.29.41.89/32'
 | |
| 
 | |
| NAT Configuration
 | |
| *****************
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 description 'Internal to ASP'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 destination address '172.27.1.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 outbound-interface 'any'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 source address '192.168.43.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 110 translation address '172.29.41.89'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 120 description 'Internal to ASP'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 120 destination address '10.125.0.0/16'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 120 outbound-interface 'any'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 120 source address '192.168.43.0/24'
 | |
|   set nat source rule 120 translation address '172.29.41.89'
 | |
| 
 | |
| IPSec IKE and ESP
 | |
| *****************
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ASP has documented their IPSec requirements:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * IKE Phase:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * aes256 Encryption
 | |
|   * sha256 Hashes
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ESP Phase:
 | |
| 
 | |
|   * aes256 Encryption
 | |
|   * sha256 Hashes
 | |
|   * DH Group 14
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Additionally, we want to use VPNs only on our eth1 interface (the external interface in the image above)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike ikev2-reauth 'no'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike key-exchange 'ikev1'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike lifetime '7800'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike proposal 1 dh-group '14'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike proposal 1 encryption 'aes256'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ike-group my-ike proposal 1 hash 'sha256'
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp compression 'disable'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp lifetime '3600'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp mode 'tunnel'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp pfs 'disable'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp proposal 1 encryption 'aes256'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec esp-group my-esp proposal 1 hash 'sha256'
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec ipsec-interfaces interface 'eth1'
 | |
| 
 | |
| IPSec VPN Tunnels
 | |
| *****************
 | |
| 
 | |
| We'll use the IKE and ESP groups created above for this VPN. 
 | |
| Because we need access to 2 different subnets on the far side, we will need two different tunnels.
 | |
| If you changed the names of the ESP group and IKE group in the previous step, make sure you use the correct names here too.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 authentication mode 'pre-shared-secret'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 authentication pre-shared-secret 'PASSWORD IS HERE'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 connection-type 'initiate'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 default-esp-group 'my-esp'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 ike-group 'my-ike'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 ikev2-reauth 'inherit'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 local-address '203.0.113.46'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 tunnel 0 local prefix '172.29.41.89/32'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 tunnel 0 remote prefix '172.27.1.0/24'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 tunnel 1 local prefix '172.29.41.89/32'
 | |
|   set vpn ipsec site-to-site peer 198.51.100.243 tunnel 1 remote prefix '10.125.0.0/16'
 | |
| 
 | |
| Testing and Validation
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you've completed all the above steps you no doubt want to see if it's all working.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Start by checking for IPSec SAs (Security Associations) with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sh
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ show vpn ipsec sa
 | |
| 
 | |
|   Peer ID / IP                            Local ID / IP
 | |
|   ------------                            -------------
 | |
|   198.51.100.243                          203.0.113.46
 | |
| 
 | |
|       Tunnel  State  Bytes Out/In   Encrypt  Hash    NAT-T  A-Time  L-Time  Proto
 | |
|       ------  -----  -------------  -------  ----    -----  ------  ------  -----
 | |
|       0       up     0.0/0.0        aes256   sha256  no     1647    3600    all
 | |
|       1       up     0.0/0.0        aes256   sha256  no     865     3600    all
 | |
| 
 | |
| That looks good - we defined 2 tunnels and they're both up and running.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _RFC6296: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6296
 | |
| .. _ULAs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_local_address
 |