Rewrite eBGP example comments

Since 1.3 , prefixes used in BGP `network` statements don't need to exist in your routing table by default, but the examples at the bottom of the page hadn't been updated for this change.
This commit is contained in:
Paul Lettington 2021-09-03 17:42:28 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 937facd3be
commit 83b323341e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -1043,9 +1043,9 @@ A simple eBGP configuration:
set protocols bgp 65535 parameters router-id '192.168.0.2'
Don't forget, the CIDR declared in the network statement MUST **exist in your
routing table (dynamic or static), the best way to make sure that is true is
creating a static route:**
By default the prefix declared in the network statement does not need to exist in your
routing table, but it is conventional to add it to prevent routing loops.
The best way to do that is to creat a static route:
**Node 1:**
@ -1087,9 +1087,9 @@ A simple BGP configuration via IPv6.
set protocols bgp 65535 address-family ipv6-unicast network '2001:db8:2::/48'
set protocols bgp 65535 parameters router-id '10.1.1.2'
Don't forget, the CIDR declared in the network statement **MUST exist in your
routing table (dynamic or static), the best way to make sure that is true is
creating a static route:**
By default the prefix declared in the network statement does not need to exist in your
routing table, but it is conventional to add it to prevent routing loops.
The best way to do that is to creat a static route:
**Node 1:**