The uprgade from 4.18.1.0 to 4.18.2.0-SNAPSHOT failed with error
```
2023-09-12 16:12:19,003 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.0 Code Version = 4.18.2.0
2023-09-12 16:12:19,004 INFO [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.18.1.0 to 4.18.2.0
2023-09-12 16:12:19,036 DEBUG [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) Running upgrade Upgrade41800to41810 to upgrade from 4.18.0.0-4.18.1.0 to 4.18.1.0
...
2023-09-12 16:12:19,041 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.ScriptRunner] (main:null) (logid:) -- Schema upgrade from 4.18.0.0 to 4.18.1.0
...
2023-09-12 16:12:21,602 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DatabaseAccessObject] (main:null) (logid:) Statement: CREATE INDEX i_cluster_details__name on cluster_details (name)
2023-09-12 16:12:21,663 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DatabaseAccessObject] (main:null) (logid:) Created index i_cluster_details__name
2023-09-12 16:12:21,673 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) (logid:) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 2632 Name = Upgrade; called by -TransactionLegacy.rollback:888-TransactionLegacy.removeUpTo:831-TransactionLegacy.close:655-TransactionContextInterceptor.invoke:36-ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed:175-ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke:97-ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed:186-JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke:215-$Proxy30.persist:-1-DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade:319-DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check:403-CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.checkIntegrity:64
```
It succeeded with this change.
* VMware: add support for 8.0b (8.0.0.2)
* VMware 8: add new guest os mappings in VirtualMachineGuestOsIdentifier
The full list can be found at https://developer.vmware.com/apis/1355/vsphere
* VMware: get guest os mappings of parent version
* VMware8: remove guest os mappings for 8.0.0.2
* VMware8: fix code smells
* vmware: remove annotations in VmwareVmImplementerTest which caused 0.0% code coverage
* VMware8: add a unit test case
* VMware: add support for 8.0c (8.0.0.3)
* VMware8: move to CloudStackVersion.getVMwareParentVersion
* VMware: add support for 8.0u1 (8.0.1.0)
* Copy engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/upgrade/GuestOsMapper.java from PR 6979
* Copy engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/storage/dao/GuestOSHypervisorDao.java from PR 6979
* VMware: ignore the last number in VMware versions
* VMware: copy guest os mapping from 8.0 to 8.0.1
* VMware: add unit tests in VmwareVmImplementerTest.java
* Copy engine/schema/src/test/java/com/cloud/upgrade/GuestOsMapperTest.java from PR 6979
* VMware8: retry vm poweron if fails due to exception "File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed"
This fixes a weird issue on vmware8. When power on a vm, sometimes it fails due to error
2023-04-27 07:04:43,207 ERROR [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-442:ctx-cdd42b03 10.0.32.133, job-105/job-106, cmd: StartCommand) (logid:8a24a607) StartCommand failed due to [Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException
Message: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
].
java.lang.RuntimeException: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.util.VmwareClient.waitForTask(VmwareClient.java:426)
at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.VirtualMachineMO.powerOn(VirtualMachineMO.java:288)
in vmware.log on ESXi host, it shows
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Power on failure messages: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Failed to lock the file
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Cannot open the disk '/vmfs/volumes/7b29c876-ac102328/i-2-167-VM/ROOT-167.vmdk' or one of the snapshot disks it depends on.
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Module 'Disk' power on failed.
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Failed to start the virtual machine.
There is a KB article for it, but I still do not know why and how to fix it.
https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/1004232
* VMware: extract to method powerOnVM
* vmware: fix mistake in logs
* vmware8: use curl instead of wget to fix test failures
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 555, in test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80
self.execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests(vpc_offering)
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 641, in execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests
client_vm, applb.sourceipaddress, max_http_requests)
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 497, in run_ssh_test_accross_hosts
(e, clienthost.public_ip))
AssertionError: list index out of range: SSH failed for VM with IP Address: 10.0.52.187
and
sshClient: DEBUG: {Cmd: /usr/bin/wget -T3 -qO- --user=admin --password=password http://10.1.2.253:8081/admin?stats via Host: 10.0.52.188} {returns: ["/usr/bin/wget: '/usr/lib/libpcre.so.1' is not an ELF file", "/usr/bin/wget: can't load library 'libpcre.so.1'"]}
* VMware: correct guest OS names in hypervisor mappings for VMware 8.0
el9 and variants were introduced by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7059
they are supported with guest os identifiers since VMware 8.0
see https://vdc-repo.vmware.com/vmwb-repository/dcr-public/c476b64b-c93c-4b21-9d76-be14da0148f9/04ca12ad-59b9-4e1c-8232-fd3d4276e52c/SDK/vsphere-ws/docs/ReferenceGuide/vim.vm.GuestOsDescriptor.GuestOsIdentifier.html
* VMware: add Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04 support for vmware 7.0+
* PR7380: only add guest os mappings for Ubuntu 20.04
* PR7380: Correct RHEL9 guest os names and others for VMware 8.0
* PR7380: correct guest os names on 8.0.0.1 as well
* PR7380: remove Windows 12 and Windows Server 2025 which are not released yet
CPU cap limitation was enabled as part of
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6420 that changes behaviour
for existing environments. The CPU cap limitation on KVM causes
systemvms to not start or be really slow in nested and virtualised
environments.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Supported Virtual machine operations:
- live migration of VM to another host
- virtual machine snapshots (group snapshot without memory)
- revert VM snapshot
- delete VM snapshot
Supported Volume operations:
- attach/detach volume
- live migrate volume between two StorPool primary storages
- volume snapshot
- delete snapshot
- revert snapshot
In troubleshooting ops issues we see logs like:
Maximum domain resource limits of Type 'user_vm' for Domain Id = 763 is exceeded: Domain Resource Limit = (1 bytes) 1, Current Domain Resource Amount = (0 bytes) 0, Requested Resource Amount = (1 bytes) 1."
However there is one missing value (currentResourceReservation) that is used in the calculation of limit check but it is not logged, which leads to confusion. Above we see we are using “0” and requested 1, with our limit being 1, but was rejected. Without logging all the values used in the calculation we don’t understand why it failed.
Additionally, if we had this log above it would be clearer that a second bug is occurring. When we query for domain level resource reservations in “getDomainReservation” the actual SearchBuilder is the listAccountAndTypeSearch, not the listDomainAndTypeSearch. As a result, when we call getDomainReservation the query returns any outstanding domain reservation for any account, as domain ID is not a valid filter for the account search.
This PR:
Increases detailed information in log for checking resource limit to include reservations information for functions: checkDomainResourceLimit() and checkAccountResourceLimit
Fixes getDomainReservation() to use listDomainAndTypeSearch instead of listAccountAndTypeSearch
Co-authored-by: Oscar Sandoval <osandovalocana@apple.com>
Fixes#7389
Fixes listing of service offerings for VM scale when the current offering has `disk_offering_strictness=true`
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
This PR fixes#7362 and also other search criteria to use the name as an exact search where keyword is also there.
Made UI changes for roles search to make use of keyword instead of name.
