* VMware: add support for 8.0b (8.0.0.2)
* VMware 8: add new guest os mappings in VirtualMachineGuestOsIdentifier
The full list can be found at https://developer.vmware.com/apis/1355/vsphere
* VMware: get guest os mappings of parent version
* VMware8: remove guest os mappings for 8.0.0.2
* VMware8: fix code smells
* vmware: remove annotations in VmwareVmImplementerTest which caused 0.0% code coverage
* VMware8: add a unit test case
* VMware: add support for 8.0c (8.0.0.3)
* VMware8: move to CloudStackVersion.getVMwareParentVersion
* VMware: add support for 8.0u1 (8.0.1.0)
* Copy engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/upgrade/GuestOsMapper.java from PR 6979
* Copy engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/storage/dao/GuestOSHypervisorDao.java from PR 6979
* VMware: ignore the last number in VMware versions
* VMware: copy guest os mapping from 8.0 to 8.0.1
* VMware: add unit tests in VmwareVmImplementerTest.java
* Copy engine/schema/src/test/java/com/cloud/upgrade/GuestOsMapperTest.java from PR 6979
* VMware8: retry vm poweron if fails due to exception "File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed"
This fixes a weird issue on vmware8. When power on a vm, sometimes it fails due to error
2023-04-27 07:04:43,207 ERROR [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-442:ctx-cdd42b03 10.0.32.133, job-105/job-106, cmd: StartCommand) (logid:8a24a607) StartCommand failed due to [Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException
Message: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
].
java.lang.RuntimeException: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.util.VmwareClient.waitForTask(VmwareClient.java:426)
at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.VirtualMachineMO.powerOn(VirtualMachineMO.java:288)
in vmware.log on ESXi host, it shows
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Power on failure messages: File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of LookupAndOpen[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - File system specific implementation of Ioctl[file] failed
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Failed to lock the file
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Cannot open the disk '/vmfs/volumes/7b29c876-ac102328/i-2-167-VM/ROOT-167.vmdk' or one of the snapshot disks it depends on.
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Module 'Disk' power on failed.
2023-04-27T09:20:41.713Z In(05)+ vmx - Failed to start the virtual machine.
There is a KB article for it, but I still do not know why and how to fix it.
https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/1004232
* VMware: extract to method powerOnVM
* vmware: fix mistake in logs
* vmware8: use curl instead of wget to fix test failures
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 555, in test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80
self.execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests(vpc_offering)
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 641, in execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests
client_vm, applb.sourceipaddress, max_http_requests)
File "/root/test_internal_lb.py", line 497, in run_ssh_test_accross_hosts
(e, clienthost.public_ip))
AssertionError: list index out of range: SSH failed for VM with IP Address: 10.0.52.187
and
sshClient: DEBUG: {Cmd: /usr/bin/wget -T3 -qO- --user=admin --password=password http://10.1.2.253:8081/admin?stats via Host: 10.0.52.188} {returns: ["/usr/bin/wget: '/usr/lib/libpcre.so.1' is not an ELF file", "/usr/bin/wget: can't load library 'libpcre.so.1'"]}
* VMware: correct guest OS names in hypervisor mappings for VMware 8.0
el9 and variants were introduced by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7059
they are supported with guest os identifiers since VMware 8.0
see https://vdc-repo.vmware.com/vmwb-repository/dcr-public/c476b64b-c93c-4b21-9d76-be14da0148f9/04ca12ad-59b9-4e1c-8232-fd3d4276e52c/SDK/vsphere-ws/docs/ReferenceGuide/vim.vm.GuestOsDescriptor.GuestOsIdentifier.html
* VMware: add Ubuntu 20.04 and 22.04 support for vmware 7.0+
* PR7380: only add guest os mappings for Ubuntu 20.04
* PR7380: Correct RHEL9 guest os names and others for VMware 8.0
* PR7380: correct guest os names on 8.0.0.1 as well
* PR7380: remove Windows 12 and Windows Server 2025 which are not released yet
* Replace Hashtable with LinkedHashMap in createIsoResponse
This change replaces the use of Hashtable with LinkedHashMap in the `createIsoResponse` method of `ViewResponseHelper`.
The reason for this modification is to maintain the insertion order of entries, which isn't the case with Hashtable.
This could lead to more predictable results and behaviors in calling methods.
* Replace Hashtable with LinkedHashMap in view response creation methods
Changed Hashtable to LinkedHashMap in various response creation methods within ViewResponseHelper class.
This modification ensures an ordered iteration which is beneficial for scenarios where the insertion order of responses needs to be maintained consistently.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sina Kashipazha <soreana@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR aims to polish the UI with following tweaks and changes:
- Increase resource and os-logo icons both in list view, user-menu bar and VM deployment form
- Fix css issues in VM deployment form when resource icons are on some of the templates/isos but not all
- Replace edit icon in the resource icon editting button on the infocard, in resource view
- Fix css marging/padding issue for nav bar and left-branding/logo
- Introduce a new Limits option in the user menu, to allow users to see their own limits when they log in
- Rename resource tab to limits tab for accounts, project and domains
- Introduce a new copy-label component, that can be clicked to copy strings; use in info-card and list view for entites such as IP addresses and UUIDs
- Add router-link to /zones/ in case of user-accounts (when /zone isn't routable in the UI)
- Show better list of nics and ssh keys pairs in infocard for VM resource view
- Standardise most resources to show state/status columns right after resource name (wherever applicable)
- Remove displayname column in VM list view, add cpu number and memory by default
- Add k8s version column in k8s list view
- Add size and phy size columns in case of template and ISOs list view, only for root/domain admins
- Add phy network router-link in case of guest VLAN list view; rearrange columns list for consistency
- Add snapshot phy size column in the snapshot list view; and router-link for volume in the snapshot list view; and missing/useful details in the volume snapshot details view
- Add a create and add data disk feature in Instances tab, just like we've add nic feature in the same
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
* cloudstack: bump to use 4.18.1.0 systemvmtemplate
Use new 4.18.1.0 systemvmtemplate
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
* fix cd ISO url
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
steps to reproduce the issue:
- git clone https://github.com/apache/cloudstack.git
- cd cloudstack
- rm -rf .git/
- run `mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install`
Without this PR, it fails with error
```
> [ 8/10] RUN mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install:
668.1 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal pl.project13.maven:git-commit-id-plugin:4.9.10:revision (get-the-git-infos) on project cloud-plugin-storage-volume-storpool: .git directory is not found! Please specify a valid [dotGitDirectory] in your pom.xml -> [Help 1]
```
CPU cap limitation was enabled as part of
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6420 that changes behaviour
for existing environments. The CPU cap limitation on KVM causes
systemvms to not start or be really slow in nested and virtualised
environments.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
* Removed the hardcoded StorPool endpoint from tests
- removed the hardcoded enpoint of StorPool primary storage from tests
- added the git commit information into the maven build
* Convert indents to spaces
* update git-commit-id-plugin version
When install cloudstack on latest rocky8 server with java-11-openjdk-11.0.20.0.8-2.el8.x86_64, management server cannot be started due to error
```
Caused by: java.lang.Error: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-11.0.20.0.8-2.el8.x86_64/lib/tzdb.dat (No such file or directory)
```
It is because the package `tzdata-java` is not automatically installed.
(It was installed with java-11-openjdk-11.0.18.0.10-2.el8_7.x86_64, but not with latest java-11-openjdk-11.0.20.0.8-2.el8.x86_64)
Since Kubernetes v1.24.0, there is no auto-generation of secret-based service account token due to security reason. see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/108309
To access kubernetes dashboard, users need to create a service account and an optional long-lived Bearer Token for the service account.
This PR addresses rare case of potential overlap of resource reservation and resource count.
For different resource types there could be some delay between incrementing of the resource count and clearing of the earlier done reservation. This may result in failures when there are parallel deployments happening.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
