This adds an upgrade path from 4.3.1 to 4.4.0, the implementation of which
simply extends the Upgrade430to440 as there was no schema change between 4.3.0
and 4.3.1
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
(cherry picked from commit 208399354fa82513e2fb70738cb6eee8454ea3a5)
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
In vm secondary ips case static nat configured to vm primary/secondary ips
IP1-->vm1Ip1, IP2-->vm1Ip2
While destroying vm deleting all static nats associated with the vm
1. While destroying a ROOT volume do the lookup of the associated VM under the DC and not just cluster.
2. In case of VMware, during VM start if a volume is being recreated no need to detach the old volume because
we now expunge it immediately and don't wait for the storage cleanup task to run.
- Check to see if network is implemented changed from 'state == Implementing||Implemented' to 'state == Implemented'.
The earlier check was a hack to prevent the issue described below.
- At the time of implementing network (using implementNetwork() method), if the VR needs to be deployed then it follows
the same path of regular VM deployment. This leads to a nested call to implementNetwork() while preparing VR nics. This
flow creates issues in dealing with network state transitions. The original call puts network in "Implementing" state
and then the nested call again tries to put it into same state resulting in issues. In order to avoid it, implementNetwork()
call for VR is replaced with below code.
cleanup the rules then destroy
fix adds a provision to specify if cleanup is needed on network on
shutdown. VR is marked as to not to require network rules clean up on
network shutdown as the VR is destroyed and recreated.
ran the simulator tests that test network life cycle
The following changes are made:
- Check to see if network is implemented changed from 'state == Implementing||Implemented' to 'state == Implemented'.
The earlier check was a hack to prevent the issue described below.
- At the time of implementing network (using implementNetwork() method), if the VR needs to be deployed then
it follows the same path of regular VM deployment. This leads to a nested call to implementNetwork() while
preparing VR nics. This flow creates issues in dealing with network state transitions. The original call
puts network in "Implementing" state and then the nested call again tries to put it into same state resulting
in issues. In order to avoid it, implementNetwork() call for VR is replaced with below code.
