On the 'NICs' tab, when a user clicks the 'Add network to VM' button to add a network to a VM, the 'Add network to VM' popup screen does not have an IP Address input field to allow a user to define a specific IP Address for a NIC. A user can specify the IP address for the first NIC when creating a VM instance, but cannot do that for subsequent NICs when adding a network to a VM.
To Reproduce:
Go to the 'Instances' screen by clicking the 'Instances' tab on the lefthand side.
On the 'Instances' screen click on a specific VM instance name.
This will open the 'Details' tab for the specific VM instance.
Click on the 'NICs' tab and then click on the 'Add network to VM' button to add a network to a VM.
The 'Add network to VM' popup screen will display.
Actual Behaviour:
The 'Add network to VM' popup screen does not have an IP Address input field to allow a user to define a specific IP Address for a NIC.
Expected behaviour:
The 'Add network to VM' popup screen must have an IP Address input field to allow a user to define a specific IP Address for a NIC.
Since the addNicToVirtualMachine API's ipaddress field is not required, the IP Address input field is also not a required field.
The IP Address input field must be validated for a valid IPv4 formatted value if the user enters anything into the field.
The valid user-specified IPv4 IP Address value must be allocated to the NIC if it is within the acceptable IP range for the chosen Network.
Previously, the ethernet device index was used as rt_table index and
packet marking id/integer. With eth0 that is sometimes used as link-local
interface, the rt_table index `0` would fail as `0` is already defined
as a catchall (unspecified). The fwmarking on packets on eth0 with 0x0
would also fail. This fixes the routing issues, by adding 100 to the
ethernet device index so the value is a non-zero, for example then the
relationship between rt_table index and ethernet would be like:
100 -> Table_eth0 -> eth0 -> fwmark 100 or 0x64
101 -> Table_eth1 -> eth1 -> fwmark 101 or 0x65
102 -> Table_eth2 -> eth2 -> fwmark 102 or 0x66
This would maintain the legacy design of routing based on packet mark
and appropriate routing table rules per table/ids. This also fixes a
minor NPE issue around listing of snapshots.
This also backports fixes to smoketests from master.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
On the 'Register Template From URL' screen, when a user selects the VMware option from the Hypervisor dropdown:
It incorrectly displays the 'HVM' checkbox.
This checkbox must be hidden in the VMware context.
This checkbox must still be visible in any other hypervisor context.
To Reproduce:
Go to the 'Register Template From URL' screen by clicking the 'Templates' tab on the lefthand side.
On the 'Templates' screen click the 'Add' button to display the 'Register Template From URL' screen.
On the 'Register Template From URL' screen, select the VMware option from the Hypervisor dropdown:
Actual Behaviour:
It incorrectly displays the 'HVM' checkbox.
Expected behaviour:
This checkbox must be hidden in the VMware context.
This checkbox must still be visible in any other hypervisor context.
In the UI, on the Instances screen, the Quickview popup window and the Details window do not display the 'Reset SSH Key Pair' button for VMs in a running state. They only display when the VM is in a stopped state. This is inconsistent with the 'Reset Password' button behaviour, where it displays in both VM states: running and stopped. This fixes the issue so that the 'Reset SSH Key Pair' button also displays in both VM states.
Expected Behaviour:
In the UI, on the Instances screen, the Quickview popup window and the Details window must display the 'Reset SSH Key Pair' button in both VM states: running and stopped. When a user clicks on the 'Reset SSH Key Pair' button and a VM is in a running state, it will display a message "Vm xxx should be stopped to do SSH Key reset".
Actual Behaviour:
In the UI, on the Instances screen, the Quickview popup window and the Details window do not display the 'Reset SSH Key Pair' button for VMs in a running state. It only displays when the VM is in a stopped state.
In the Add Zone Wizard, when a user lands on the Physical Network page, by default the first Physical Network gets initialized with the 3 Traffic Types: Guest, Management and Public. When a user drags the Management or Public Traffic Types from the first Physical Network to a second or nth Physical Network and then clicks the next button to go to the next screen, and then decides to click the previous button to go back to the Physical Network screen, the UI initializes the physicalNetwork again and thus moves these Traffic Types back to their original position in the first Physical Network as if it is the first time the user navigated to this page.
A fix was made so that when a user clicks the previous button to go back to the Physical Network screen, it does not initialize the physicalNetwork again, therefore leaving the user-defined Traffic Type configuration as it was before the next button was clicked.
On the 'Register Template From URL' screen, when a user selects the KVM option from the Hypervisor dropdown:
1) It incorrectly displays the 'Original XS Version is 6.1' checkbox. This checkbox should be hidden in the KVM context.
2) The 'Root Disk Controller' dropdown should display the default option of 'osdefault' instead of a blank default option.
Fixes the version in pom etc. to be consistent with versioning pattern as X.Y.Z.0-SNAPSHOT after a minor release.
Signed-off-by: Khosrow Moossavi <khos2ow@gmail.com>
As rolling restart does not deallocate an IP before configuring it on a new VR, the code must allow it to be reused on a non-redundant VPCs gateway nic.
In crease ping counts to reduce intermittent failures in smoketests.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
This ensure that fewer mount points are made on hosts for either
primary storagepools or secondary storagepools.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Using Source NAT option on Private Gateway does not work
This fixes#2680
## Description
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
When you use the Source NAT feature of Private Gateways on a VPC. This should Source NAT all traffic from CloudStack VMs going towards IPs reachable through Private Gateways.
This change in this PR, stops adding the Source CIDR to SNAT rules. This should be discussed/reviewed, but i can see no reason why the Source CIDR is needed. There can only be one SNAT IP per interface, except for Static (one-to-one) NATs, which still work with this change in place. The outbound interface is what matters in the rule.
<!-- For new features, provide link to FS, dev ML discussion etc. -->
<!-- In case of bug fix, the expected and actual behaviours, steps to reproduce. -->
##### SUMMARY
<!-- Explain the problem/feature briefly -->
There is a bug in the Private Gateway functionality, when Source NAT is enabled for the Private Gateway. When the SNAT is added to iptables, it has the source CIDR of the private gateway subnet. Since no VMs live in that private gateway subnet, the SNAT doesn’t work.
##### STEPS TO REPRODUCE
<!--
For bugs, show exactly how to reproduce the problem, using a minimal test-case. Use Screenshots if accurate.
For new features, show how the feature would be used.
-->
<!-- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
Below is an example:
- VMs have IP addresses in the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet.
- The Private Gateway address is 10.101.141.2/30
In the outputs below, the SOURCE field for the new SNAT (eth3) only matches if the source is 10.101.141.0/30. Since the VM has an IP address in 10.0.0.0/24, the VMs don’t get SNAT’d as they should when talking across the private gateway. The SOURCE should be set to ANYWHERE.
##### BEFORE ADDING PRIVATE GATEWAY
~~~
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1 packets, 52 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
2 736 SNAT all -- any eth2 10.0.0.0/24 anywhere to:10.0.0.1
16 1039 SNAT all -- any eth1 anywhere anywhere to:46.99.52.18
~~~
<!-- You can also paste gist.github.com links for larger files -->
##### EXPECTED RESULTS
<!-- What did you expect to happen when running the steps above? -->
~~~
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 SNAT all -- any eth3 anywhere anywhere to:10.101.141.2
2 736 SNAT all -- any eth2 anywhere anywhere to:10.0.0.1
23 1515 SNAT all -- any eth1 anywhere anywhere to:46.99.52.18
~~~
##### ACTUAL RESULTS
<!-- What actually happened? -->
<!-- Paste verbatim command output between quotes below -->
~~~
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 SNAT all -- any eth3 10.101.141.0/30 anywhere to:10.101.141.2
2 736 SNAT all -- any eth2 10.0.0.0/24 anywhere to:10.0.0.1
23 1515 SNAT all -- any eth1 anywhere anywhere to:46.99.52.18
~~~
## Types of changes
<!--- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
- [ ] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
## GitHub Issue/PRs
<!-- If this PR is to fix an issue or another PR on GH, uncomment the section and provide the id of issue/PR -->
<!-- When "Fixes: #<id>" is specified, the issue/PR will automatically be closed when this PR gets merged -->
<!-- For addressing multiple issues/PRs, use multiple "Fixes: #<id>" -->
Fixes: #2680
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to -->
<!-- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!--- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! -->
- [x] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) document.
- [x] My code follows the code style of this project.
- [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
Testing
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
- [ ] All relevant new and existing integration tests have passed.
- [ ] A full integration testsuite with all test that can run on my environment has passed.
* packaging: use libuuid x86_64 package for cloudstack-common
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
* 64 bit links is packaged
* post scan filter to exclude libuuid.so.1
* Revert "packaging: use libuuid x86_64 package for cloudstack-common"
This reverts commit b3fb8957fe4e98c85949be2010f0316c89d535a9.
* post scan filter to exclude libuuid.so.1 (centos63)
* revert removal of 32 bit support for vhd-util libs
Not possible to deploy an Advanced zone with Security Groups, and VXLAN isolation method on KVM. Exception: "Unable to convert network offering with specified id to network profile" is logged.
In some environments running the keystore cert renewal (as root user)
over an already connected agent connection may cause exception
such as: `sudo: sorry, you must have a tty to run sudo`. Since, all
agents - KVM, CPVM and SSVM run as root user, we don't need to run
the renewal scripts with sudo.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Now the KVM agent checks whether a storage pool is mounted or not mounted before calling storagePoolCreateXML().
Signed-off-by: Kai Takahashi <k-takahashi@creationline.com>
